US-China Trade War

Wargaming a Chinese Blockade of Taiwan - presented by Center for Strategic & International Studies

 

David Petraeus on What Taiwan Can Learn from Ukraine’s Battlefield Experience - presented by Hudson Institute

Conference at Hudson Institute, a renowned think tank in the U.S.

The Fall of Woke Culture - How a good idea turns ugly

We know that the "Woke Culture" in the United States began as a progressive movement, supporting gender diversity, opposing racial discrimination, and advocating for equality and inclusion. Initially, not many people opposed it. 我們知道在美國的"覺醒文化"，一開始是一場進步運動，他支持性別多元、反對種族歧視、提倡平權與包容，本來並沒有太多人反對。 Later, things gradually went off course. 後來這事情慢慢變調了。 When these ideals started being used as a standard for judging morality, forcing people to take a stand, and even leading to cancellations, ostracism, or losing a job over a single misspoken word, facing spontaneous outpouring of criticism, insults on social media, or having one’s public image tarnished, businesses and schools became afraid to speak the truth. Over time, even those who originally supported these ideals began to feel exhausted. By 2024, woke culture had become a target of widespread criticism in American society, fueling the rise of the right wing. 當這些理念開始漸漸地被社會當作評判道德的標準，開始強迫人表態，甚至動輒封殺你，杯葛你，甚至可能講錯一句話就可能丟工作，遭到社群的圍剿，形象崩塌。企業學校為此不敢說真話。時間一長，原本支持這些理念的人快開始覺得累了。在2024年覺醒文化被徹底的淪為美國社會的眾矢之的，讓美國的右派崛起。 This phenomenon, where a consensus turns into coerced pressure, gradually becomes a form of political correctness, leading to public resentment. Excessive correctness ends up creating more enemies for itself. 這種從原本的共識變成被迫的壓力的現象，當它逐漸變成一種政治正確，導致民眾產生反感過度的正確反而給自己制造出更多的敵人。

[Joke] Bet against President Trump

A Taiwanese tag Trump betting he is going to chicken out (aka "Trump always chicken out (TACO)") again. How dare him tagging on Trump's X account and thousands of People are asking for a streaming of penis-cutting process. LOL.

btw, his English couldn't be worse...he needs to cut his penis no matter winning or failing the bet, according to his English statement (but we know his statement in Chinese anyway)

[Jun 17, 2025] News: Peace through Strength

 

[Jun 10, 2025] Anti-ICE operations and riots in Los Angeles

The anti-ICE protests in Los Angeles are a response to recent Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids targeting undocumented immigrants, which have sparked widespread demonstrations and clashes with law enforcement. The protests began after federal agents executed search warrants at several businesses suspected of employing undocumented workers, leading to arrests and public outcry. Demonstrators have gathered near federal buildings, including immigration courts and detention centers, demanding an end to ICE operations in the city, which is a sanctuary jurisdiction.

The protests have involved thousands of people blocking major freeways like the 101, setting fires to self-driving cars and dumpsters, and engaging in confrontations with police. Law enforcement has responded with tear gas, rubber bullets, flash bangs, and non-lethal foam projectiles to disperse crowds. Authorities have declared unlawful assemblies multiple times and made numerous arrests. Some protesters have thrown concrete, rocks, electric scooters, and fireworks at police, leading to injuries on both sides

The arguments of anti-ICE supporters in Los Angeles center on opposition to the federal immigration enforcement raids and the broader immigration policies under the Trump administration. Key points include:

• They view the ICE raids as overly aggressive and indiscriminate, targeting not just criminals but also innocent, hardworking immigrants and their families, which they see as a violation of fundamental rights and due process.
• Protesters and local leaders argue that the deployment of National Guard troops and Marines to Los Angeles is an unlawful overreach of federal power, undermining state and local authority and escalating tensions unnecessarily.
• Many activists frame their opposition as a defense of immigrant communities striving for the American dream, emphasizing the personal and communal impact of deportations on families and neighborhoods.
• The protests are also seen as part of a broader movement against what supporters describe as authoritarianism and a crackdown on immigrant rights, with calls to end ICE operations and deportations that they argue tear apart communities.
• Union members and community organizations have joined the protests, highlighting concerns about labor rights and the targeting of workers in ICE raids.
• Local officials like California Governor Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass have criticized the federal response as heavy-handed and counterproductive, reinforcing the protesters' stance that the federal government's actions are exacerbating unrest rather than restoring order.

Comments:

My stance is straightforward: the U.S. government is responsible and accountable primarily to the lives and well-being of American citizens, not to immigrants—especially those who are in the country illegally. Some argue that illegal immigrants have a "right" to pursue the American Dream or similar aspirations, but frankly, no such right exists for those who have entered the country unlawfully. To put it simply, it’s like breaking into someone’s house and then claiming the right to live there. That’s unreasonable.

I believe that deporting illegal immigrants is the correct course of action. However, discretionary decisions can and should be made on a case-by-case basis, particularly for individuals who pose no threat and contribute positively to society during their stay. There are established legal pathways for migration, such as obtaining a visa or green card, or seeking asylum if there are legitimate grounds. These laws must be respected. If illegal immigrants disagree with the government’s actions, they have the right to challenge them through legal channels, such as filing lawsuits, to seek lawful status.

Regarding supporters of the Anti-ICE movement, I view many as hypocritical, abusing and concealing their true motives beneath the ideology of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI). Why do I say this? I agree that society should help and provide aid to those in genuine need. However, there is a crucial distinction between offering help voluntarily and claiming that such help is an entitlement. The former reflects a majority’s willingness to assist, while the latter is a minority demanding that the majority is obligated to do so. When the majority refuses, this is framed as a violation of DEI principles.

This progressive movement has evolved to a point where it effectively hijacks mainstream society, compelling the majority to conform to the demands of a vocal minority. This dynamic is evident not only in the Anti-ICE protests but also across industries such as movie and game production and employment, where DEI policies are increasingly mandated.

Moreover, there are numerous reports highlighting the deterioration of public safety in cities due to the influx of immigrants and the perceived leniency toward criminal behavior, including drug-related offenses. The embrace of DEI is forcing mainstream society to accept the values and lifestyles of minority groups, which many view as unfair. For these reasons, I support President Trump’s stance on immigration enforcement.