Quote

I would rather be ashes than dust. I would rather my spark should burn out in a brilliant blaze, than it should be stifled in dry-rot. I would rather be a superb meteor, with every atom of me in magnificent glow, than a sleepy and permanent planet. - Jack London 寧化飛灰,不作浮塵。 寧投熊熊烈火,光盡而滅;不伴寂寂朽木,默默同腐。 寧為耀目流星,迸發萬仗光芒;不羨永恒星體,悠悠沉睡終古。 - Chris Patten, the last Governor of Hong Kong, quoted in Hong Kong Policy Address 1996 (the last address before 1997 handover to China)

Wednesday, May 27, 2026

Ex-Labour Prime Minister Sir Tony Blair Slams Labour For 'Playing With Fire'. In Attack On Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer And His Rivals

What has Sir Tony Blair said?

Former Labour PM Sir Tony Blair has accused Sir Keir Starmer's government of
having no plan and risking losing the next election without change.

So, what did Blair say?

- Labour lacks a "coherent plan" and is in "the wrong political position from which we can devise one and win a second term"
- The party should enact policies including removing obstacles to business growth, cheaper energy and electrification, welfare reform, action on immigration, a reindustrialisation strategy, and a drive on skills and training in the age of Al
- Labour is governing in its "soft left ... comfort zone", and in the last budget increased "tax to pay for additional welfare spending, when the public already thinks welfare bills are too high"
- Changes such as new workers' rights laws, phasing out oil and gas, and raising the minimum wage faster than inflation have given "headwinds not tailwinds to British business"
- Labour lacks a defining purpose, saying that governments that succeed don't start with a "political question - how do we 'save the country' from Reform UK? They start with an idea, a project, a governing purpose, an analysis of what is wrong and a plan to put it right"
- Neither do they succeed when they start with a "personality contest", and that "trying to force the prime minister out before we know what policy direction we're bringing in, is not a serious way of conducting ourselves"
- Europe needs to "wake up" to the "home truths" it is being told by America, and "needs to build economic competitivity and military capability"
- Rejoining the EU is not the answer to the UK's problems
- Labour needs a "reimagined state in which taxes and spending can be lower, productivity higher and government seen as enabling not directing"

the Hartz Reforms (Hartz-Reformen) - Germany Reform in 2003

In 2003, German Chancellor Gerhard Schröder announced a massive, controversial package of economic and labor market reforms known as the Hartz Reforms (Hartz-Reformen).

At the time, Germany was widely referred to as the "Sick Man of Europe" (Der kranke Mann Europas). The country was suffering from economic stagnation, rigid labor laws, and a staggering unemployment rate that peaked at over 11% (around 5 million people).

The Hartz reforms radically altered the German welfare state, shifting it from a system that comfortably supported the unemployed to one that aggressively pushed them back into the workforce.

The Origin: Agenda 2010 and Peter Hartz

The reforms were part of a broader socio-economic program called Agenda 2010, which Schröder officially introduced to the Bundestag (German parliament) on March 14, 2003.

To design the labor aspect, Schröder appointed a committee led by Peter Hartz, the Chief Human Resources Officer of Volkswagen. The committee proposed a four-stage plan implemented between 2003 and 2005.

The guiding philosophy of the reforms was "Fördern und Fordern"—which translates to "Support and Demand." While the state would help you find a job, it would heavily penalize you if you refused to take one.

The Four Stages of the Hartz Reforms

The reforms were rolled out sequentially, completely restructuring the Federal Employment Agency and redefining unemployment benefits.

Hartz I & II (Implemented 2003)

  • Staffing Agencies: Created "Personnel Service Agencies" (Personal-Service-Agenturen) to act as temporary employment agencies helping the jobless ease back into full-time work.

  • "Mini-Jobs" & "Midi-Jobs": Introduced low-wage, tax-free or low-tax part-time jobs (initially capped at €400/month) to encourage the growth of the service sector.

  • Ich-AG (Me, Inc.): Offered financial grants to encourage unemployed individuals to start their own micro-businesses.

Hartz III (Implemented 2004)

  • Overhauling the Bureaucracy: Restructured the massive, inefficient Federal Employment Office into a consumer-focused, streamlined "Federal Employment Agency" (Bundesagentur für Arbeit). Job centers were redesigned to act more like recruitment firms.

Hartz IV (Implemented Jan 2005) — The Flashpoint

This was by far the most consequential and fiercely hated part of the package. It completely merged two separate long-term state programs: Unemployment Benefit (Arbeitslosenhilfe) and Social Welfare (Sozialhilfe).

  • Drastic Cuts: Before Hartz IV, long-term unemployed people could receive up to 60% of their last salary almost indefinitely. Hartz IV cut the duration of these earnings-related benefits to just 12 months (for most adults).

  • The Flat Rate: After 12 months, if you still didn't have a job, you were dropped down to a bare-minimum flat rate—originally around €345 per month plus basic housing costs.

  • Means Testing: To qualify for this basic allowance, you had to completely deplete your personal savings and assets first. Furthermore, job centers could cut your benefits if you rejected a valid job offer, regardless of whether it matched your career background.

The Fallout: Protests and Political Suicide

While economists debated the math, the social reaction was swift and furious. Millions of Germans viewed Hartz IV as an aggressive dismantlement of their beloved post-war social safety net.

  • Monday Demonstrations: Echoing the famous 1989 protests that brought down the Berlin Wall, hundreds of thousands of people marched every Monday, particularly in East Germany where unemployment was highest.

  • Political Realignment: Schröder belonged to the center-left Social Democratic Party (SPD). By squeezing the working class, he deeply alienated his own political base and fractured his party. A leftist faction split off from the SPD and eventually merged with former communists to form Die Linke (The Left party).

  • Schröder's Downfall: Plagued by plunging approval ratings and defeats in regional elections, Schröder called a snap federal election in late 2005. He narrowly lost to Angela Merkel, ending his chancellorship.


The Legacy: Economic Miracle or Social Divide?

The verdict on the Hartz reforms remains one of the most polarizing topics in modern European history.

The Success Arguments (Economic)The Criticisms (Social)
The "German Economic Miracle": By the late 2000s, Germany's unemployment plummeted, and its economy became the powerhouse of the Eurozone.The Low-Wage Sector: The reforms created a massive sub-class of working poor who relied on "Mini-Jobs" and temporary contracts without long-term security.
Global Competitiveness: Lower labor costs made German exports incredibly competitive on the world stage.Stigma and Inequality: "Hartz IV" entered the German vocabulary as a derogatory slang term synonymous with systemic poverty and bureaucracy.
Merkel's Foundation: Many historians argue that Angela Merkel's stable, prosperous 16-year tenure was entirely built on the tough economic foundation Schröder laid down.Deepened Wealth Gap: Critics argue it permanently chipped away at middle-class financial security and fueled the rise of populist politics.

Ultimately, the political ghost of Hartz IV lingered for nearly two decades until the German government officially abolished the name in January 2023, replacing the controversial system with a less punitive program called Bürgergeld (Citizen's Allowance).

Saturday, May 16, 2026

台灣真的需要 "獨立" 嗎?

中華民國沒滅亡,中華民國在台灣 (事實)

中華民國建國於1912,中華人民共和國建國於1949 (事實)

中華人民共和國的領土是從中華民國手上奪得 (事實)


那麼邏輯告訴我,

中華民國 是不可能從 中華人民共和國 "獨立" 出去的

因為中華民國 建國 早於 中華人民共和國
而且中華民國本身就是一個國家
是 中華人民共和國 從 中華民國"分裂"出來